Manmadhan Ambu

Actors: Kamal Haasan, R Madhavan, Trisha Krishnan, Sangeetha

Genre: Rom-com

Rating: 3/5

Like most rom-coms Manmadhan Ambu does not hold many surprises, no doubt about that. Since story is not the USP, it’s anyone’s guess the focus elements would be the starcast (their performances), the screenplay and more importantly humour, given the genre. Based across different European travel destinations, the plot written by Kamal Hassan is about a South Indian actress, Ambu (Trisha) on a cruise-holiday with her childhood pal Deepa (Sangeetha) and her kids. While, her hammered-forever lover and ‘tusiness bycoon’ Madan (Madhavan) funds the *European holiday* of Major Mannar (Kamal Hassan) to spy on Ambu’s movements and report any infidelity. Mannar’s interest in the deal is to be able to fund his friend Rajan’s (Ramesh Aravind) cancer treatment. Madan breaches the deal, so the rest of the story is about Mannar manipulating the situation for further monetary benefit, and eventually winning Ambu’s companionship. 

PERFORMANCES: 

Per popular reports, in any movie Ulaga Nayagan takes centerstage, stubbing out every other cast member, correct? Wrong. For once, Kamal Haasan is not the cynosure. Mannar may have come easy to Kamal, no specific mannerisms, a cool composed middle-aged man having a way with women, executing a *plan*, basically trying to set things straight. Kamal has done this umpteen times, does not fail at all in delivering laughs, jerking out tears, make you smile at his wits, teach a thing or two about chauvinism and romance, including how to look young(er). The portion of Kamal Kavithai recital by Kamal to Trisha observes a woman’s perception of the ideal man. Find the poem and its English translation here. Kamal may not be that guy in real life, but he does make you sit up and take notice how this 50-year-old does everything he does, with élan. Madhavan has shared screen time with Kamal earlier too. Some may feel that the role of Madan may have gotten relegated to a second fiddle. This is simply owing to the nature of Madan’s character and potentially due to the ideal male’s image for Indian cine-goers. Madhavan plays Madan’s character well, who is mostly in an inebriated condition, lugging around, talking under influence, and such related behavior. Madan is kinda, sorta the rich, bad guy who’s breaches Mannar’s trust, Ambu’s trust and an immature lover needing his mother to validate most of his decisions, but Madhavan makes sure he does not look like a villain.Madhavan has taken care so the performance does not appear clichéd, yet maintains his characteristic city-boy charm. 

Trisha was literally herself and could not have done Ambu’s role any better. She was able to cruise through the role, and as usual gets credit for her glamour and for her flirtatious glances. Ambu’s chemistry with Mannar is definitely more palpable, while it must have been some work for Trisha (also supported by the script) to justify Ambu’s relationship with Madan, her changing chemistry with him, give and take over time to seamlessly transition into Mannar’s lover. Trisha must also get brownie points for her role as a childhood friend of Deepa’s (Sangeetha), how they interact as two girl pals, how she behaves with Deepa’s kids and trying to portray how simple an actress’s personal life can be, devoid of public attention in a foreign country. If there could have been any improvement, it should have been about pulling out some more drone out of Ambu’s life, who was possibly designed that way, yet. Most of K S Ravikumar’s films have a married woman adding the humour element in equal proportions as the male protagonist, and not necessarily their opposite. Sangeetha plays that woman, Deepa, a divorced mother of two who is rich, and a friend of Ambu’s. She is shrewd, and knows how to move things around. Sangeetha must get credit for driving the chunk of trademark humour we expect in Kamal’s movies, especially in the second half of the film. Clearly a supporting but very likeable character, Sangeetha as Deepa has displayed abilities of humour, oomph, audacity, and glib, and rationally leaves a strong impression on the viewer, as an important character.

DIRECTION, SCREENPLAY & CINEMATOGRAPHY & MUSIC:

Direction and Screenplay by K S Ravikumar are average by his own standards. The reason possibly is his challenge, to manage two ends of the story, Rajan in Chennai and Mannar on the cruise with Trisha; abridge both stories while keeping it entertaining all the while. The roles could have been stronger, but there are elements of reality like a dying friend needing money, Mannar losing his wife, Madan and Ambu’s relationship issues, etc. Such sequences can potentially change the mood of the scenes. These may have worked negatively against Ravi. Cinematography by newcomer Manush Nandan is average too. The European locales haven’t been captured as beautifully the could have been. The scenes appear crowded but Manush has been extremely good with capturing nature shots  (greenery, waters, open skies, etc). The song video ‘Neela Vanam’ with -motion going backward  but Kamal singing forward is uniquely done. Music by Devi Sri Prasad has certainly not struck gold. Mostly dappankuthu music with some classy percussions, the tunes are not an instant attraction, or so I would think. Neela Vaanam and Kamal Kavithai are interesting renditions, and may find a safe place in our minds.

Why 3/5:

Overall, the film lacks freshness. The performances are good, but the characterization for any individual swivels from a happy person to a sad person and back. The characters are not surreal at all for a movie, working negatively for the feel of the movie. The Direction and Screenplay fall short, the music is pretty average too. The main incentive to watch a *timepass* movie like this would be to watch your favourite stars do their thing, or to cruise through a smooth movie, if really not about having a great time.